Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Jenkins v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00355
Plaintiff:
Joseph Leslie Jenkins
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00375
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
Isaac Sheldon Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00365
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
Ryan Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nuten v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00356
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
Toma Tee Nuten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv00882
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
Isaac Sheldon Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Croy v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00376
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Croy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00366
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
Archie Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv00881
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
David Lamont Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00380
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
Steven Curtis Travis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00377
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John J. Clancy and James V. Beale
Plaintiff:
John E. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
