Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Solberg v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00381
Petitioner:
John M Solberg
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Solberg v. Hachey et al
as 2:2023cv01590
Petitioner:
John M Solberg
Respondent:
C Hachey, J Kozulla and B Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Solberg v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01482
Petitioner:
John M Solberg
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Solberg v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00925
Petitioner:
John M Solberg
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solberg v. Krueger
as 1:2023cv00795
Petitioner:
John M Solberg
Respondent:
J E Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Solberg v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
John M Solberg
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dorsey v. Gasiorkiewicz et al
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Joe R Dorsey
Defendant:
Eugene A Gasiorkiewicz, Wynne Laufenberg, Commissioner Alice A Rudebusch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huiras v. Cafferty et al
as 2:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
Nathan John Huiras
Defendant:
Kristen Cafferty, Megan McGee Harris, Jessica Anne Groundberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
