Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
DAKER v. WARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff: WASEEM DAKER
Defendant: COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00212
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00153
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00213
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DAKER v. WARD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00365
Defendant: COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, PARALEGAL JAMIE A VALLEE, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Plaintiff: WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00130
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MOORE v. AMERICUS RESTAURANT GROUP INC et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff: TRAVIS MOORE
Defendant: AMERICUS RESTAURANT GROUP INC, JOHN PAUL JOINER and RICHARD LEE TYSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MAJOR v. TOOLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00483
Plaintiff: TROY MAJOR
Defendant: ROBERT TOOLE, JOHN PAUL, DELOACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARINGTON v. CHATMAN et al
as 5:2012cv00036
Plaintiff: MORRIS JEROME CLARINGTON
Defendant: BRUCE CHATMAN and JOHN PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARINGTON v. CHATMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00035
Plaintiff: MORRIS JEROME CLARINGTON
Defendant: BRUCE CHATMAN and JOHN PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?