Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
John R. Adams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Adams
as 5:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Brian Williams
Defendant:
Judge John R. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BARTOLI v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2021cv02195
Plaintiff:
ERIC BARTOLI
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JEFFERY M. OLSON, JOHN R. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Adams v. Judicial Council of the Sixth, et al
as 20-5288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John R. Adams, The Honorable
Defendant / Appellee:
Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United States and Judicial Council of the Sixth Circuit
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv18359
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN R ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2017cv01894
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. ADAMS
Defendant:
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, R. GUY COLE, COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jamel Smith v. John Ferrero, Jr., et al
as 17-3726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMEL A. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN D. FERRERO, JR., Stark County Prosecutor, TAMMI R. JOHNSON, Stark County Public Defender, JUDGES OF THE STARK COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and others
United States of America v. Adams et al
as 1:2017cv01169
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Donna M Adams and John R Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Adams et al
as 1:2012cv01320
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John R Adams and Donna M Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
