Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Futch v. Batts
as 1:2014cv00188
Petitioner: John Randall Futch
Respondent: Myron L. Batts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Futch v. Batts
as 1:2014cv00180
Petitioner: John Randall Futch
Respondent: Myron L Batts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: John Futch
as 14-14955
Petitioner: In re: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Mandamus Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dunn et al v. Takata Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv24009
Plaintiff: Craig Dunn, Pam Koehler, Zulemarie Rivera and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Dorry Taylor
Defendant: Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc., The Hertz Corporation and Chrysler Group LLC
Claimant: John Randall Futch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Futch v. Kastner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv01043
Petitioner: John Randall Futch
Defendant: Paul A Kastner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv02371
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
John Futch v. USA
as 14-13084
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. John Futch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-11770
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party - Appellant: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Futch v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00076
Petitioner: John Randall Futch
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: John Futch
as 14-11538
Petitioner: In re: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Mandamus Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?