Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Velasco et al v. City of Salinas et al
as 3:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jose Velasco and Rita Acosta
Defendant:
City of Salinas, David Pritt, Ciro Barboza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Velasco et al v. City of Salinas et al
as 2:2016at00026
Plaintiff:
Jose Velasco and Rita Acosta
Defendant:
City of Salinas, David Pritt, Ciro Barboza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meghan Aguilar et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05644
Plaintiff:
Meghan Aguilar, Teddy Amstone, Sang An and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Randolph Agard v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05668
Plaintiff:
Randolph Agard, Deen Alcaraz, Francisco Banuelos and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Richardson v. Swarthout
as 2:2013cv01355
Petitioner:
John Richardson
Respondent:
Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson
as 3:2013cv02109
Petitioner:
John Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
-CT Benson Young v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2008cv03207
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Gilbert Curtis, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Benson Young
Unknown:
Susan C V Jones and Deane L Shanander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv05831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Richardson v. California Department of Corrections
as 2:2009cv02458
Plaintiff:
John Richardson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Sacramento Superior Court et al
as 2:2008cv03091
Petitioner:
John Richardson
Respondent:
Sacramento Superior Court and Stanislaus Superior Court
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
