Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Leroy Wells v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-5021
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
John Roberts, Chief Justice United States Supreme Court, D.S.G., U.S.D.C.D. Or. Pendleton Division; Clerk, John Does, U.S.D.C.D. Or. Pendleton Division; Clerks and others
WELLS v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2023cv02533
Plaintiff:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, DSG, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Demos, Jr., et al v. USA, et al
as 23-5187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Society of T.R.U.T.H
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Washington, D.C., Donald J. Trump, President and others
KIMNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
AUDREY L. KIMMER and AUDREY L. KIMNER
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, JOHN ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEMOS v. JACKSON
as 1:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
ROBERT M. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SCHIFF v. BLAIR et al
as 1:2022cv03845
Defendant:
GRAHAM SCHIFF, RICHARD BLAIR, PAUL COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen Calton v. U.S. Supreme Court, et al
as 22-5298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen F. Calton
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, John Roberts, Justice, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Justice and others
CHAND et al v. MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY
as 1:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
SALLY CHAND, MICHAEL CHAND, JR., CHRISTINA MAHON and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams, et al
as 22-5056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
