Cases 31 - 40 of 642
Demos v. Bayer et al
as 2:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Bayer, Jennifer Adams, M Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. Clerk of the Court, et al
as 23-35342
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
CLERK OF THE COURT and OFFICERS AND JUDGES OF THE STATE SUPREME COURT
John Demos, Jr. v. United States District Court
as 23-35343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Demos et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr, District of Columbia, The Virginia Corporation and others
Defendant:
United States of America, The 3 Branches of Government, United States Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections, DSG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Robert Silvis v. County of Riverside
as 5:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
John Robert Silvis
Defendant:
County of Riverside
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. Theresa Fricke, et al
as 23-35242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
THERESA L. FRICKE, U.S. Magistrate Judge, ERIN L. LENNON, Clerk of State Supreme Court, TANA LINN, U.S. District Court Judge and others
John Demos, Jr. v. Robert Jackson
as 23-35243
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT M. JACKSON
Demos v. Clerk of the Court et al
as 2:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Clerk of the Court and Officers and Judges of the State Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
