Cases 1 - 10 of 35
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WELLS v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2023cv02533
Plaintiff:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, DSG, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KIMNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
AUDREY L. KIMMER and AUDREY L. KIMNER
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, JOHN ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEMOS v. JACKSON
as 1:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
ROBERT M. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SCHIFF v. BLAIR et al
as 1:2022cv03845
Defendant:
GRAHAM SCHIFF, RICHARD BLAIR, PAUL COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAND et al v. MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY
as 1:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
SALLY CHAND, MICHAEL CHAND, JR., CHRISTINA MAHON and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
GORBEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Defendant:
WILLIAMS, FORREN, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'CONNOR v. BARNES et al
as 1:2021cv02641
Plaintiff:
NYKA O'CONNOR
Defendant:
REDMOND BARNES, SCOTT HARRIS, JOHN ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. EASTERLY et al
as 1:2020cv00608
Defendant:
CATHARINE FRIEND EASTERLY, ALICIA LONG, JOSE M. LOPEZ and others
Plaintiff:
ZAFARAH I. BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REINER v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2020cv00031
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, CALIFORNIA STATE BAR, DOES 1 THROUGH 10 and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN REINER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
