Cases 1 - 6 of 6
-Scott v. Richards et al
as 3:2024cv03398
Defendant:
Jing Zhao and John S. Richards
Plaintiff:
Christopher -Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Ins. v. Antonelli, Terry, et al
as 10-2404
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP and DONALD E. STOUT, Esq.
Defendant:
ADRIENNE ANDROS FERGUSON, individually and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF ANDREW A. ANDROS, EMILY J. ANDROS, individually and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF ANDREW A. ANDROS, JULIA LYNN ANDROS, individually and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF ANDREW A. ANDROS and others
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insur v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Krau
as 09-1049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP and DONALD E. STOUT, Esq.
Defendant - None:
ADRIENNE ANDROS FERGUSON, individually and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF ANDREW A. ANDROS, EMILY J. ANDROS, individually and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF ANDREW A. ANDROS, JULIA LYNN ANDROS, individually and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF ANDREW A. ANDROS and others
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP et al
as 1:2008cv01020
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP, Donald E. Stout, Adrienne Andros Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Richards v. Peas & Carrots Catering, Inc. et al
as 9:2008cv80765
Plaintiff:
John S. Richards
Defendant:
Peas & Carrots Catering, Inc. and Randy S Epstein
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ferguson et al v. Stout et al
as 1:2008cv20947
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Andros Ferguson, Adrienne Andros Ferguson, Adrienne Andros Ferguson and others
Defendant:
Donald E. Stout, Donald E. Stout, Donald E. Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.