Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Hovarter v. Ugwueze et al
as 2:2011cv03442
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hovarter
Defendant:
Godwin Ugwueze, Jean Pierre, Rafael Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Clark et al
as 2:2011mc00034
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
John Scott Clark, Impact Cash LLIC and Impact Payment Systems LLC
Receiver:
Gil A Miller
Securities and Exchange Commission v. John Scott Clark et al
as 5:2011mc00011
Defendant:
John Scott Clark, Impact Cash LLC and Impact Payment Systems LLC
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Clark et al
as 3:2011mc00480
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
John Scott Clark, Impact Cash, LLC and Impact Payment Systems, LLC
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Clark et al
as 3:2011mc80070
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
John Scott Clark, Impact Cash, LLC and Impact Payment Systems, LLC
Christine Murray v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2010cv01675
Defendant:
County of Orange, Does, Michael Hillmann and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Murray
John Scott Simpson et al v. The City of Upland
as 5:2008cv01117
Movant:
Jeffrey S Benice
Defendant:
City of Upland Police Department, Does and The City of Upland
Plaintiff:
A. S., Deborah Jean Simpson, John Scott Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Jack Anderson et al v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2010cv00958
Plaintiff:
Jack Anderson, Deana Bergquist, Brian Cossairt and others
Defendant:
County of Orange, DOES, Michael Hillman and others
Datest Corporation et al v. Breeden et al
as 3:2009cv00442
Plaintiff:
Datest Corporation, Datest Corporation, John Innes and others
Defendant:
John Scott Breeden, III, Thomas Seabury, Robert S. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
