Cases 51 - 60 of 67
U.S. Bank, National Association v. Jamnik et al
as 1:2012cv01779
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Alan Jamnik , Ramy Jamnik , 478 Essentials Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shah v. Muller et al
as 1:2012cv00938
Defendant:
Et All, Robert S. Muller, James O'Kelley(Ficticious Name) and others
Plaintiff:
Elsa Peralta Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv08825
Petitioner:
John Smith
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden, Otisville FCI and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Auleta v. The United States Department of Justice et al
as 9:2011cv00951
Plaintiff:
Francis Auleta
Defendant:
The United States Department of Justice, Merrily A. Friedlander, John Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pujols et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv03328
Plaintiff:
Francis Pujols , Juan Pujols , Benancia Pujols and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, Kenneth Hines, P.O. John Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Povoski v. LaValley et al
as 9:2011cv00120
Defendant:
R. Carine, Kevin Hart, Daniel Clancy and others
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Povoski, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2011cv00076
Defendant:
County of Nassau, John Does #1-5, John Does #1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Iyanna Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mason v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv09697
Plaintiff:
Derrick Mason
Defendant:
The City of New York , David Desimone, "John" Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulmore v. Raimo et al
as 9:2010cv01096
Plaintiff:
Demore Fulmore
Defendant:
Eugene Raimo, John Smith and Jeremy Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States
as 1:2010cv04129
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
