Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Subramaniam v. Beal et al
as 3:2012cv01681
Defendant: Masse Adjety, David Allison, Ally Financial and others
Plaintiff: Denise Subramaniam
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-56878
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tanis Watt v. David Roth, et al
as 08-17462
Plaintiff - Appellant: TANIS JOCELYN WATT
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID LEE ROTH, PFIZER, HEALTH PLAN OF SAN MATEO, THE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-35557
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Humanitarian Law, et al v. U.S. Treasury Dept., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-55893
Plaintiff - Appellant: HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT, RALPH FERTIG, HANKAI THAMIL SANGAM and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT, JOHN W. SNOW, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General and others
Newdow, et al v. US Congress, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-16344
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL NEWDOW
Defendant - Appellee: PETER LEFEVRE, Law Revision Counsel, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN W. SNOW, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE
Amicus Curiae: ATHEISTS AND OTHER FREETHINKERS, THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, United States Senator JIM DEMINT; United States Representatives ROBERT B. ANDERHOLT; W. TODD AKIN; ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, KEVIN BRADY; JOHN CAMPBELL; STEVE CHABOT; CHRIS FEENEY; VIRGINIA FOXX; TRENT FRANKS; SCOTT GARRETT; and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2005cv02977
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?