Cases 1 - 9 of 9
John Ward v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv02771
Plaintiff:
John Ward
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
EMED Technologies Corporation v. Repro-Med Systems, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00598
Defendant:
Andrew I Sealfon, Repro-Med Systems, Inc. and Repro-Med Systems, Inc. Doing business as RMS Medical Products
Plaintiff:
Emed Technologies Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Judge T John Ward
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Ward v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00593
Plaintiff:
John Ward
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. American Zurich Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv03140
Plaintiff:
John Ward and Pierce Ward
Defendant:
American Zurich Insurance Company , Travelers Casualty and Surety Company , ACE Property & Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv09122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ward et al v. GoIndustry USA Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01562
Defendant:
Does, DoveBid Inc, GoIndustry DoveBid Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee and John Ward
Ward v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 5:2009mc80022
Plaintiff:
John Ward and John Ward
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc. and others
Movant:
Richard Frenkel, Richard Frenkel, Richard Frenkel and others
Joe Juneau v. Phillip A. Kenner et al
as 2:2008cv08284
Plaintiff:
Joe Juneau and Joe Juneau
Defendant:
Phillip A. Kenner, Standard Advisors, Inc., Standard Advisors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Michael Jerome Windfield v. John Ward
as 2:2008cv00296
Petitioner:
Michael Jerome Windfield
Respondent:
John Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
