Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Fishback v. Bishop, Jr. et al
as 1:2016cv01237
Petitioner:
John William Fishback, III
Respondent:
Frank Bishop, Jr. and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al v. Cutshall
as 1:2015cv04002
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John William Cutshall
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Williams v. Stewart et al
as 1:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
John Williams
Defendant:
K. Stewart, John Wolfe and Gary Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fishback v. State of Mayland et al
as 1:2012cv00927
Plaintiff:
John William Fishback
Defendant:
State of Mayland, Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland Court of Special Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Kelleck et al v. KBR Inc et al
as 8:2009cv03304
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kelleck, Dan Bowlds, Tony Allen Gouckenour and others
Defendant:
KBR Inc, Kellogg Brown and Root Services Inc, Kellogg Brown and Root LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perlaki et al v. P&S Painting Co., Inc.
as 1:2008cv01316
Plaintiff:
John William Perlaki and Elizabeth G. Perlaki
Defendant:
P&S Painting Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Smithers v Arundel Mills Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2007cv03219
Plaintiff:
John William Smithers, Sr. and John William Smithers, Sr.
Defendant:
Arundel Mills Limited Partnership and Arundel Mills LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
