Cases 41 - 50 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01066
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01067
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Atah El v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv00948
Petitioner:
Sakitah Selmah Atah El
Respondent:
Warden John Wolfe, Warden Margaret Chippendale and The Attorney General of State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith-Bey v. Warden John Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv00764
Petitioner:
Charles Arnell Smith-Bey
Respondent:
Warden John Wolfe and The Attorney General of State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maurice El v. Warden John Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv00763
Petitioner:
Lamont Maurice El
Respondent:
Warden John Wolfe, Warden Margaret Chippendale and The Attorney General of State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sloan v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2015cv00693
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sloan
Defendant:
John Wolfe, Smith, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Marshall v. Ava Joubert
as 15-6335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. AVA JOUBERT, DR. COLIN OTTEY, DR. RIZVI SYED and others
Defendant:
LT. BRANDON BARNETT, CAPT. SHAW, WARDEN JOHN WOLF and others
Party-in-Interest:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
John Woodlin v. John Wolfe
as 14-7803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WOODLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN WOLFE, Warden, MR. ALLEN GANG, Chief Security, LIEUTENANT HAMILTON and others
Gerald v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2014cv03286
Petitioner:
Ronald Gerald
Respondent:
John Wolfe and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Williams v. K. Stewart
as 14-7179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. STEWART, Hearing Officer, JOHN WOLFE, Warden and GARY MAYNARD, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
