Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Yahweh v. Harris et al
as 2:2012cv02869
Plaintiff:
I-Ariel Daniel: ibn Yahweh
Defendant:
Chris Harris, Shelby County Sheriff Department, Lee V. Coffee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee; et al
as 2:2012cv02493
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Young
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee, Louis J. Montesi, Jr., M. Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Loudon County, Tennessee et al (TV1)
as 3:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
James S. Berry
Defendant:
Loudon County, Tennessee , Teresa Smith , John and Jane Doe Deputies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rollins v. Boyce et al
as 4:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Doris Rollins
Defendant:
Randall Boyce , Tim Lokey , Donna Delrio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnside v. Walters et al
as 2:2009cv02727
Plaintiff:
William David Burnside
Defendant:
T. Walters, Hicks, Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. County of Tipton, Tennessee et al
as 2:2008cv02772
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dewayne Davis and Kendrick Dewayne Davis
Defendant:
County of Tipton, Tennessee, Tipton County Sheriff Department, J. T. Chumley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hightower et al v. Pinkston et al
as 3:2008cv00355
Plaintiff:
Eva M Hightower and Eva M Hightower
Defendant:
Dorothy Pinkston, Dorothy Pinkston, Dorothy Pinkston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
E.R. v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2008cv02378
Plaintiff:
E.R.
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Shelby County, Shelby County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
