Cases 31 - 40 of 167
Keeton v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Keeton
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., LVNV Funding LLC and John and Jane Does Numbers 1 Through 25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ambalu v. Law Offices of Paul L. Marks, PLLC et al
as 7:2014cv05677
Plaintiff:
Aaron Ambalu
Defendant:
Law Offices of Paul L. Marks, PLLC , Paul L. Marks , Collection Bureau of the Hudson Valley, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Keeton v. Tate & Kirlin Associates et al
as 1:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Keeton
Defendant:
Tate & Kirlin Associates , LVNV Funding, LLC and John and Jane Does Numbers 1 Through 25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv03784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Katz v. M.L. Zager, P.C. et al
as 7:2014cv03704
Plaintiff:
David Katz
Defendant:
M.L. Zager, P.C., Michael L. Zager, Joseph Loughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Babcock v. C. Tech Collections Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03124
Defendant:
James Argent, C. Tech Collections Inc., John and Jane Does Numbers 1 through 25 and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Babcock
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Friedman v. Dynia & Associates, LLC et al
as 7:2014cv01080
Plaintiff:
Varda Friedman
Defendant:
Dynia & Associates, LLC, Alfred S. Dynia, Anthony Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
