Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Kingera et al
as 2:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Jones, III
Defendant:
Jim Kingera, Eric Christiansen, Susan Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Stolk et al
as 3:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Jones, III
Defendant:
Sgt Stolk, Chet Rigney, Lt Rigney and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jia Jia USA LLC v. GBS Business Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv02212
Defendant:
Jeannie Shiang-Mei Wey, Dionisio Lee aka Johnny Yang, POA Commercial, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jia Jia USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mascaro v. Forward Impressions et al
as 2:2019cv00813
Defendant:
Andrew, Forward Impressions and Charlene Martin
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Mascaro
Bass v. USA
as 2:2016cv00889
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Bass
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Timothy Filson, et al.
as 3:2015cv00320
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Jones, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Barrett et al
as 2:2014cv00303
Defendant:
C. Ball, Barrett and Dwight Nevin
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Jones, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parham v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2013cv01460
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Johnnie Lee Parham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Nevin et al
as 2:2013cv01171
Defendant:
Julio Calderon, Dwight Nevin and Wickham
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Jones, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Jones v. Nevin et al
as 2:2011cv00584
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight Nevin
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Jones, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
