Cases 1 - 10 of 22
SMITH v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
GUZMAN, III v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00679
Plaintiff:
JOHN GUZMAN, III
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
FARRIS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
JOHN FARRIS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
FAGAN v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00706
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALAN FAGAN, JR.
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FATTALEH v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00499
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
JOHN FATTALEH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
DEAN v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00378
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JOHN LLOYD DEAN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RADFORD v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv00624
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
JOHN RADFORD
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
STOWE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00121
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. STOWE
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HODGE V. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00678
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. HODGE
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SHOOK v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01237
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDWARD SHOOK
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
