Cases 1 - 10 of 6,778
MADLINGER v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06185
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MADLINGER
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., JOHN DOES and ABC CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SEYDINHASHEMI et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2024cv06223
Plaintiff:
SANAZ SEYDINHASHEMI and SHAHRIAR TOUYSERKANI
Defendant:
ANTHONY J BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, JULIE EADEH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
John BuckshawIn re: John Buckshaw
as 24-1855
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Respondent:
JOHN ROSENBURGER and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
ALKALINE WATER HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. WEAR et al
as 2:2024cv01890
Plaintiff:
ALKALINE WATER HOLDINGS, LLC, KEYSTONE WATER HOLDINGS, LLC and H20 STATION HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
RYAN WEAR, CREATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, WATER STATION MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
FUREY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv05770
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FUREY
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN DOES (1-10) and ABC CORPS (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001 National Insurance Flood Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
