Cases 11 - 20 of 873
Lohden v. Decker
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Edward Lohden, Jr.
Defendant:
Luke Decker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ast v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
John Raymond Ast
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Essex v. USA
as 5:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
John Michael Essex
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Taylor v. Gilley
as 6:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Taylor
Respondent:
John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson et al v. Page et al
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Paul Jackson and Jessica Jackson
Defendant:
Sgt Noah Page, Destin Owens, Calloway County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Starks et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Lee Starks, John Doe, Ofc David Killop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Trump
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Cross et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Ofc Cross, Calloway County, WKCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallory et al v. Smith et al
as 0:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
James Mallory, Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhhammad and Mrs. Porshia Moneice Mallory
Defendant:
Phillip Smith, John Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallory et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Mallory, Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhhammad and Mrs. Porshia Moneice Mallory
Defendant:
Phillip Smith, John Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
