Cases 11 - 20 of 872
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Jenkins et al
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
Scott Jenkins, Dale Durrer, Carson Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Demetrius D. Wallace
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson, Gregory Holloway, Rick White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brumfield v. Keller et al
as 7:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Mark Brumfield
Defendant:
Major Keller, Major Stokes and John Doe No.1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Cope et al
as 7:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Tony Shaw
Defendant:
Sgt. Cope, Sgt. McCoy, Major Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrne v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
John M. Byrne, Jr.
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wilkins et al v. Rasnake et al
as 7:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Andre Curtis Wilkins
Defendant:
Investigator K. Rasnake, Unit Manager C. Dye, Warden Isreal D. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
John Robert Martin, Jr.
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drakeford v. Earhart et al
as 7:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Rahsan Drakeford
Defendant:
Unit Mngr. Earhart and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Manis et al
as 7:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Mr. Carl A. Manis, Mr. J.L. Brown, Mr. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
