Cases 11 - 20 of 219
Horton v. Garland
as 5:2022cv00894
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Skurkey v. Daniel et al
as 5:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
John V Skurkey
Defendant:
William Daniel, Paul E Quigley and Anne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Horton v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Federal Personnel Records Center and National Guard Bureau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ferrell et al v. Deere & Co
as 5:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Monty Ferrell
Defendant:
Deere & Co doing business as John Deere
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Gerhart v. Bennett
as 5:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Albert G Gerhart
Defendant:
John Robert Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oklahoma State of et al v. Biden et al
as 5:2021cv01136
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of, J Kevin Stitt, John M O'Connor and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Horton v. Hoffman et al
as 5:2021cv01098
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Jared T Hoffman and Stephen Eschenbacher
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Oklahoma State of et al v. Biden et al
as 5:2021cv01069
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of, Kevin J Stitt and John M OConnor
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Garg v. VHS Acquisition Subsidiary No 7 Inc et al
as 5:2021mc00005
Petitioner:
Ashu Garg
Respondent:
VHS Acquisition Subsidiary No 7 Inc doing business as Saint Vincent Hospital, David Bader, John Mukai and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
