Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Jay Lurz v. Jon Galley
as 11-6276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY TIMOTHY LURZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JON P. GALLEY, Warden, ROBERT M. FRIEND, Lieutenant, AL DAVIS, Hearing Officer and others
Calvin Bradshaw v. Walter Wirsching
as 10-6231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN BRADSHAW
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER WIRSCHING, Director, SHARON BAUCOM, M.D., ELEANOR BOULES, R.N. Manager and others
Lurz v. Galley et al
as 1:2009cv02664
Plaintiff:
Jay T. Lurz
Defendant:
Jon P. Galley, Robert M. Friend, Al Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves et al v. Creek et al
as 8:2009cv00438
Plaintiff:
Gerald Graves and Gwendolyn Graves
Defendant:
Creek, Bobby P. Shearin, Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Lee, Jr. v. John Curran, Jr.
as 09-6126
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN WESLEY LEE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., The Attorney General of the State of Maryland, JON P. GALLEY, Warden and BOBBY SHEARIN
Bradshaw v. Ulrsching et al
as 8:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
Calvin Bradshaw
Defendant:
Walter Ulrsching, Sharon Baucom, Eleanor Boules and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John Lee, Jr. v. J. Curran, Jr.
as 08-8549
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN WESLEY LEE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., The Attorney General of the State of Maryland, JON P. GALLEY, Warden and BOBBY SHEARIN
Daniel Hall v. Bobby Shearin
as 08-8268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL VINCENT HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden, HARRY B. MURPHY, Assistant Warden, FRANK B. BISHOP, Chief of Security and others
Dante Bruce v. Jon Galley
as 08-7902
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANTE BRUCE
Respondent - Appellee:
JON P. GALLEY, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Bradshaw v. Stouffer et al
as 8:2008cv02186
Plaintiff:
Calvin Bradshaw
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, J. Michael Stouffer, Jon P. Galley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
