Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jonas v. LTL Management, LLC et al.
as 1:2023cv02058
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Holdco (NA), LTL Management, LLC, Kenvue, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Jonas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
United States Of America v. Stutzman et al
as 2:2022cv02769
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Renna L Stutzman, Jonas H Stutzman, Logan County Treasurer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Updike et al v. Jonas et al
as 1:2022cv00374
Plaintiff:
Sarah Updike, James Updike, I.U. and others
Defendant:
Sara Jonas, Linda Hausfeld, Bob Bibb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv02118
Plaintiff:
Jonas Brooks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
United States Of America v. Stutzman et al
as 2:2020cv00603
Defendant:
Logan County Treasurer, Ohio Departament of Taxation, Renna L Stutzman and others
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Jonas v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03464
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Keith Jonas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jonas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02044
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jonas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley v. City of Ashtabula et al
as 1:2018cv02495
Defendant:
Leo Talikka, City of Ashtabula, Robert Stell and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00914
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jona Murphy and Ryan Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Oninku et al
as 1:2017cv00599
Plaintiff:
Marquez Coleman
Defendant:
Jonas Oninku, Edwin Bailey, Brendan C. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
