Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Mitchell v. Lavorado et al
as 6:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
James Jonathan Mitchell
Respondent:
M Lavorado, Daiquiri Duncan, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. LAVORADO et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONATHAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
M LAVORADO, DAIQUIRI DUNCAN, LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuney v. USA
as 1:2023cv01538
Petitioner:
Jonathan Mitchell Cuney
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mitchell v. Veterans Alliance, LLC
as 3:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mitchell
Defendant:
Veterans Alliance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anderson v. Nail
as 6:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Jonathan Mitchell Anderson
Respondent:
Commissioner Michael W. Nail
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19117
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN MITCHELL MURPHY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MITCHELL v. DIXON et al
as 3:2022cv23539
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONATHAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, JOHN KOLODZIEJ, ALEXYS HILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Mitchell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 22-12689
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES JONATHAN MITCHELL
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32769
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. INCH
as 3:2021cv00533
Petitioner:
JAMES JONATHAN MITCHELL
Respondent:
MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
