Cases 31 - 40 of 2,846
Davis v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Andrew Davis
Defendant:
Officer Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Ted Jackson, Officer Jones and Officer Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00702
Petitioner:
Otis Parker
Respondent:
Mr. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Holmes et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr., Micky Eugene Hamilton, Jed Allen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Woodruff
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Omar Derwayne Jones
Defendant:
James Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Woodruff
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Omar Derwayne Jones
Defendant:
James Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
