Cases 31 - 40 of 54
JONES et al v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv00238
Plaintiff:
HAROLD M JONES and GLORIA JONES
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HAMLIN v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00082
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R HAMLIN
Defendant:
USA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, NOEL C MARCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
HAYWARD v. JONES
as 1:2012cv00020
Petitioner:
JOEL T HAYWARD
Respondent:
SCOTT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. TEXAS TDCJ ID ADMINISTRATION, et al
as 2:2012cv00019
Plaintiff:
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Defendant:
TEXAS TDCJ ID ADMINISTRATION, TEXAS ENTIRE JUDICIAL SYSTEM, TEXAS 1996-2012 ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. FAIRBANK RECONSTRUCTION CORP et al
as 2:2011cv00437
Plaintiff:
EMMIE JONES and JONES
Defendant:
FAIRBANK RECONSTRUCTION CORP and GREATER OMAHA PACKING COMPANY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BROWN v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 2:2011cv00426
Plaintiff:
CRAIG BROWN
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, WILLIAM J SCHNIEDER, ROBERT PERKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANAEME v. USA et al
as 1:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
CHIBUEZE C ANAEME
Defendant:
USA, DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL AND FINANCIAL REGULATION, OFFICE OF LICENSING AND REGULATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FLOOD v. JONES
as 1:2011cv00281
Petitioner:
ANDREW P FLOOD
Respondent:
SCOTT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RUFFIN v. COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ONEIL RUFFIN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , SCOTT JONES and CAROL GEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
