Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Coleman, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 24-4023
Plaintiff:
RALPH COLEMAN, JORGE ANDRADE RICO, PETER COCKCROFT and others
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, JEFF MACOMBER, JOE STEPHENSHAW and others
Coleman, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 24-3707
Plaintiff:
RALPH COLEMAN, JORGE ANDRADE RICO, PETER COCKCROFT and others
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, JEFF MACOMBER, JOE STEPHENSHAW and others
Rico v. Ducart, et al.
as 24-3038
Plaintiff:
JORGE ANDRADE RICO
Defendant:
CLARK E. DUCART, JIM ROBERTSON, D BRADBURY and others
Coleman, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 24-2938
Plaintiff:
RALPH COLEMAN, JORGE ANDRADE RICO, PETER COCKCROFT and others
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, JEFF MACOMBER, JOE STEPHENSHAW and others
Coleman, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 24-2263
Plaintiff:
RALPH COLEMAN, JORGE ANDRADE RICO, PETER COCKCROFT and others
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, JEFF MACOMBER, JOE STEPHENSHAW and others
Rico v. Secretary of CDCR et al
as 5:2023cv02122
Plaintiff:
Jorge Andrade Rico
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR, H. Mosley, R. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jorge Rico v. James Robertson, et al
as 21-16880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORGE ANDRADE RICO
Defendant / Appellee:
F. P. MARULLI, Lieutentant at P.B.S.P., D. ABERNATHY, Sergeant at P.B.S.P., C. PARRY, P.B.S.P. Official and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL STAINER, SCOTT KERNAN, KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden and others
Jorge Rico v. M. Bristow, et al
as 21-15584
Defendant / Appellee:
M. BRISTOW, Lieutenant, M. HODGES, Appeal Examiner, Office of Apeals, A. SHELDON, Correction Counselor I and others
Petitioner:
JORGE A. RICO
(PC) Rico v. Ducart et al
as 2:2019cv01989
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, Associate Warden G. W. Olson, Taylor Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Andrade Rico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rico v. Bristow et al
as 3:2019cv05892
Defendant:
C.E. Ducart, D. Bradburry, M. Voong and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Rico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
