Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In Re: Harisadhan Patra and Petula Vaz, et al v. , et alIn re: In Re: Harisadhan Patra and Petula Vaz, et al v. , et al
as 24-1168
Petitioner:
In re: HARISADHAN PATRA and PETULA VAZ
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY, FRANK T. BROGAN, individually and in his official capacity as Chancellor and others
Harisadhan Patra, et al v. Pennsylvania State System of H, et al
as 20-2320
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SOLTZ, individually and in his official capacity as President of Bloomsburg University, PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, IRA BLAKE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARISADHAN PATRA and PETULA VAZ
Harisadhan Patra, et al v. Pennsylvania State System of H, et al
as 19-3065
Not Yet Classified:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, THOMAS R. ZALEWSKI, IRA BLAKE and others
BAKER DC, LLC v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
as 1:2015cv00571
Plaintiff:
BAKER DC, LLC , SHANNON W. COTTON , MICHAEL A. MURPHY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Movant:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , COALITION FOR A DEMOCRATIC WORKPLACE , NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2012cv00634
Petitioner:
Jorge E. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada
as 3:2010cv00574
Petitioner:
Jorge E. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fudge v. City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv02665
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas Fudge
Defendant:
City of New York, Maria Zapata and Jorge E. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
