Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lenroy McLean v. Myron Batts, et al
as 15-10410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LENROY MCLEAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MYRON BATTS, Warden, LOUIS WILLIAMS, III, Assistant Warden, FNU BARTLETT, Captain and others
Dearmond v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00123
Plaintiff:
David Dearmond
Defendant:
United States of America, Karen Edenfield, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McLean v. Batts et al
as 1:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Lenroy McLean
Defendant:
Myron Batts, R Phillip Guiterrez, Louis Williams, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014cv03069
Plaintiff:
Charles F. Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America, (fnu) Chester, Claude Maye and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huggins v. US Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Alfred Allen Huggins
Defendant:
US Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jorge Partida and Roberto Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Edenfield et al
as 1:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hayes
Defendant:
K. Edenfield, Jorge Partida, Roberto Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Edenfield et al
as 7:2012cv00123
Defendant:
Roberto Acosta, Javier Alvarez, Warden K. Edenfield and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. United States of America Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv00521
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Ruiz
Defendant:
Karen Edenfied, Jorge Partida and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Clifford Durham v. K. Edenfield, et al
as 12-10058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD DURHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
K EDENFIELD, Warden, JORGE PARTIDA, M.D., C.D., V. A. BELTRAN, Dr., DMD and others
Durham v. Edenfield et al
as 1:2011cv00131
Plaintiff:
Clifford Durham
Defendant:
K. Edenfield, Jorge Partida, V.A. Beltran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
