Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. De Jesus-Reyes et al
as 3:2019cv01231
Defendant:
Conjugal Partnership De Jesus-Serrano, Jose Luis De Jesus-Reyes and Mildred Noemi Serrano-Torres
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
CitiMortgage, Inc v. Sanchez-De Jesus et al
as 3:2015cv02846
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc
Defendant:
Juan Jose Sanchez-De Jesus, Alice Nydia Garcia-Toro and Conjugal Partnership Sanchez-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. De Jesus-Carrasquillo et al
as 3:2015cv01647
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Jose Daniel De Jesus- Carrasquillo, Monica Celeste Llado-Ortega and Conjugal Partnership De Jesus-LLado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Colon-de-Jesus v. USA
as 3:2015cv01441
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Colon-de-Jesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Figueroa-Rossy v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 3:2012cv01891
Plaintiff:
Sofia Figueroa-Rossy
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico Police Department, Pedro Toledo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Velazquez-Morales, et als v. Paul
as 3:2011cv01333
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Velazquez-Morales , Antonio Diaz-Martinez , Jesus Vazquez-De Leon and others
Defendant:
Carol Paul, Joe Montalbano and JSM Blueberries LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Maldonado et al v. Municipality of Barceloneta et al
as 3:2007cv01992
Plaintiff:
Madeline Maldonado, Madeline Maldonado, Abraham Valencia and others
Defendant:
Municipality of Barceloneta, Sol Luis Fontanes, Jane Public and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Morales-De-Jesus v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv01941
Plaintiff:
Jose Morales-De-Jesus
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
