Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Fierros et al v. Gupta et al
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Fierros, Miguel Cervantes Barboza and Jose Antonio Cervantes Barboza
Defendant:
Anshu Kumar Gupta, MD, Scripps Memorial Hospital Encinitas, Does 1 to 40 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Removal- Personal Injury
Cervantes v. Tesla, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Cervantes
Defendant:
Tesla, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as Tesla Motors, Inc and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 bc Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
CERVANTES v. MENARD, INC.
as 1:2021cv02686
Plaintiff:
JOSE D CERVANTES
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Martinez-Cervantes
as 21-20438
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Martinez-Cervantes, also known as Jesus Antonio Esquivel, also known as Jose Ramirez Cervantes
CERVANTES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04881
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE J CERVANTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose R. Cervantes v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2020cv02063
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Jose R Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
USA v. Jose Cervantes-Arteaga
as 20-10036
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE GUSTAVO CERVANTES-ARTEAGA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Vega-Cervantes v. USA
as 19-11270
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE VEGA-CERVANTES
Yinghui Cai v. Jose L. Cervantes et al
as 2:2018cv09815
Defendant:
Rosa M. Cervantes, Jose L. Cervantes and Does 1 to 10
Plaintiff:
Yinghui Cai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
