Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fierro #044803 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
Jose Abel Fierro
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fierro #044803 v. Davod et al
as 2:2022cv01851
Plaintiff:
Jose Abel Fierro
Defendant:
Lillian Davod, Monica Lipford, Unknown Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fierro #044803 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02462
Defendant:
Stacey Crabtree, D Kruzyka, P Weston and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Abel Fierro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fierro #044803 v. Latto
as 2:2020cv02461
Defendant:
Unknown Latto, P Weston, D Globus and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Abel Fierro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Fierro v. Keith Smith, et al
as 19-16786
Defendant:
M. ESPINOZA, C.O. IV/ Grievance Coordinator at Central Unit - Florence, MALACHINSKI, MOLERA, C.O. II and others
Defendant / Appellee:
L. FORESTER, D.W., KEITH SMITH, Security Operations Administrator at Phoenix Division Director's Office, PANANN DAYS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE ABEL FIERRO
Jose Fierro v. Keith Smith, et al
as 17-15288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSE ABEL FIERRO
Defendant - Appellant:
KEITH SMITH, Security Operations Administrator at Phoenix Division Director's Office, MARLENE COFFEY, PRUETT and others
Fierro v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv02173
Plaintiff:
Jose Abel Fierro
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Keith Smith, Greg Fizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Fierro v. Richardson, et al
as 09-15914
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ABEL FIERRO
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARDSON, #532, Grievance Co, SANDRA PERFETTO, Supervisor, LANCE R. HETMER, Warden and others
Fierro v. Richardson et al
as 4:2007cv00580
Plaintiff:
Jose Abel Fierro
Defendant:
Richardson, Sandra Perfetto, Lance R Hetmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
