Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mogan v. State Bar of California, et al.
as 24-3492
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOGAN, ATTORNEY
Defendant:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, GEORGE CARDONA, in his official capacity as Chief Trial Counsel For the State Bar of California, and in his individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER JAGARD, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief Trial Counsel for the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel and in his individual capacity and others
Reiner v. Navarette, et al.
as 23-3993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN REINER
Defendant / Appellee:
JORGE NAVARETTE, TOM ZHANG, TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE and others
Todd R.G. Hill et al v. The Board of Directors, Officers and Agents and Individuals of the Peoples College of Law et al
as 2:2023cv01298
Defendant:
Hector Candelario Pena Ramirez, Jessica Viramontes, The Board of Directors, Officers and Agents and Individuals of the Peoples College of Law and others
Plaintiff:
Todd R. G. Hill
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Reiner v. Navarette et al
as 3:2021cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark Reiner and Martin Reiner
Defendant:
Jorge Navarette, Tom Zhang, Tani Cantil-Sakauye and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Christopher Cisneros v. USA
as 18-71851
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JOSE CISNEROS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christopher Cisneros v. USA
as 17-71705
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JOSE CISNEROS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jose Cisneros-Castillo
as 13-20534
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE VICTOR CISNEROS-CASTILLO, also known as Jose Victor Castillo Cisneros, also known as Jose Victor Castillo-Cisneros, also known as Jose Victor Cisneros, also known as Jose Cisneros, also known as Jose Cisneros-Castillo, also known as Jose Victor Cisne
USA v. Jose Jesus Cisneros-Zavala
as 13-10275
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE CISNEROS-ZAVALA and JOSE JESUS CISNEROS-ZAVALA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
