Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Cardenas v. Hernandez et al
as 6:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Cardenas
Defendant:
Jose Hernandez and The City of Garden City, Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hernandez-Gamon v. Garland
as 23-9599
Petitioner:
JOSE HERNANDEZ-GAMON
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Moraga, et al v. Garland
as 23-9597
Petitioner:
ILEANA MORAGA, ILLIANA HERNANDEZ MORAGA, JOSE HERNANDEZ CASTELLON and others
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Mendoza v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
as 1:2023cv01834
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez Mendoza
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hernandez Virula v. USA et al
as 1:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez Virula
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Robert Mather and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 - Judicial Review of Agency Action
Hernandez Aceves v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01766
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez Aceves
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hernandez-Cruz v. Barr
as 20-9504
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
JOSE HERNANDEZ-CRUZ
Hernandez-Gil v. Dental Dreams et al
as 2:2017mc00316
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez-Gil
Defendant:
Dental Dreams , Sameera Tasnim Hussain , Dental Dreams LLC and others
Respondent:
James R. Stringham
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
United States of America v. $17,400 in United States Currency et al
as 1:2014cv00412
Defendant:
$17,400 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Jose Hernandez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
