Cases 1 - 10 of 203
Hernandez-Pineda v. Garland
as 24-1092
Petitioner:
JOSE HERNANDEZ-PINEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hernandez-Gamon v. Garland
as 23-9599
Petitioner:
JOSE HERNANDEZ-GAMON
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Moraga, et al v. Garland
as 23-9597
Petitioner:
ILEANA MORAGA, ILLIANA HERNANDEZ MORAGA, JOSE HERNANDEZ CASTELLON and others
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
USA v. Jose Hernandez
as 23-13336
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE HERNANDEZ
Rossy v. City of Buffalo
as 23-7296
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF BUFFALO, and its agents, servants and employees, JUSTIN TEDESCO, Buffalo Police Department P.O., JOSEPH ACQUINO, Buffalo Police Department P.O. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARGARITA ROSSY, as Administrator of the Estate of Jose Hernandez-Rossy
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, and its agents, servants and employees
Juan Hernandez Domingo v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-11045
Petitioner:
JUAN JOSE HERNANDEZ DOMINGO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez Virula v. USA et al
as 1:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez Virula
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Robert Mather and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 - Judicial Review of Agency Action
USA v. Rodriguez-Pedraza
as 22-40780
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rufino Rodriguez-Pedraza, also known as Jose Hernandez-Jaimes, also known as Jose Martin Hernandez Jaimes
USA v. Amaro-Lopez
as 22-10871
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Luis Adrian Amaro-Lopez, also known as Ramon NLN, also known as Jose Hernandez, also known as Marco Ortiz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
