Cases 31 - 40 of 179
Rodriguez v. Nieves et al
as 2:2019cv01644
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Lt Matousik, Michael Nieves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Rodriguez v. Clark
as 1:2019cv01126
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Rodriguez v. Diaz et al
as 1:2019cv01118
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
Rosemary Ndoh, Ralph Diaz and Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Nassau County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2019cv04489
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
Donahue and Nassau County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Suffolk County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2019cv04200
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Nassau County Correctional Facility
as 2:2019cv04074
Plaintiff:
Nassau County Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Jose Rodriguez, Nassau County Correctional Center, C.O. Barbara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2019cv00494
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. LaManna
as 2:2018cv07196
Respondent:
J. LaManna
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moret-Acevedo v. Rodriguez-Galarza et al
as 3:2018cv01827
Defendant:
Mary E Lopez-Negron, Official Montalvo and Jose Rodriguez-Galarza
Plaintiff:
Reinaldo Moret-Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Rodriguez-Ramirez v. Jefferson R. Sessions et al
as 5:2018cv02289
Defendant:
M. Booker, Heriberto H. Telez, Does 13-25 health care providers, professional capacities and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
