Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tejada et al v. Kromer
as 2:2022cv05665
Plaintiff:
Jose Tejada, Bryan Mathew Tejada and XP Transportation, LLC
Defendant:
William W. Kromer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Tejada et al v. XP Transportation, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv05665
Plaintiff:
Jose Tejada and Bryan Mathew Tejada
Defendant:
XP Transportation, LLC and William W. Kromer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Tejada et al v. XP Transportation, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv07913
Plaintiff:
Jose Tejada and Bryan Mathew Tejada
Defendant:
XP TRANSPORTATION, LLC and WILLIAM W. KROMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hardy v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01334
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hardy
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Lieutenant Eric Dym, Sergeant Natalie Bautista and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tejada v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv04861
Petitioner:
Jose Tejada
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tejada v. On Guard Management Services Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03957
Plaintiff:
Jose Tejada
Defendant:
On Guard Management Services Inc., Robert Alberts and Diesel U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tejada v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00668
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jose Tejada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Charlot et al v. Ecolab, Inc.
as 2:2012cv04543
Plaintiff:
Anthony Charlot, Alan Remache and Jose Tejada
Defendant:
Ecolab, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tejada v. Brilliant Jewelers Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03885
Defendant:
MJJ Brilliant, Brilliant Jewelers Inc., Brilliant Jewelers, MJJ Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Tejada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Green v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Keshawn Green
Defendant:
The City of New York , Supervisor Police Officer John Doe #1, Jacob Merino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
