Cases
Nnebe v. Daus
as 18-1254
Plaintiff: Alexander Karmansky, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellee: Jonathan Nnebe, New York Taxi Workers Alliance, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Kharirul Amin and others
Defendant: Charles Frazier
Defendant - Appellant: Matthew Daus, Joseph Eckstein, Elizabeth Bonina and others
Nnebe v. Daus We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-866
Plaintiff: Alexander Karmansky, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jonathan Nnebe, Kharirul Amin, Eduardo Avenaut and others
Defendant - Appellee: Matthew Daus, Joseph Eckstein, Elizabeth Bonina and others
Defendant: Charles Frazier
Rothenberg v. Dau
as 10-4411
Plaintiff - Appellant: Saul Rothenberg, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Ebrahim Abood, Individually and on behalf of all others similary situated, Tobby Kombo, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: Matthew Daus, Diane McGrath-McKechnie, Joseph Eckstein and others
ECKSTEIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2009cv30079
Plaintiff: JOSEPH ECKSTEIN
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Rothenberg et al v. Matthew Daus et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00567
Plaintiff: Saul Rothenberg, Ebrahim Abood and Tobby Kombo
Defendant: Matthew Daus, Diane McGrath-McKechnie, Joseph Eckstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rothenberg et al v. Daus et al
as 1:2007cv04279
Plaintiff: Saul Rothenberg and Tobby Kombo
Defendant: Matthew Daus, Diane McGrath-McKechnie, Joseph Eckstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?