Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Garcia v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2017cv02947
Plaintiff:
Patrick Joseph Garcia
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eads v. City and County of Denver, Colorado, The , et al.
as 1:2017cv02476
Plaintiff:
Christopher Justin Eads
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Colorado, The, Jena Blea-Flores, Jena (I) Blea Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Esquibel v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00248
Plaintiff:
Gary Esquibel
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Joseph Garcia, Pete Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Metropolitan Detention Center, et al.
as 1:2016cv01294
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center , Board of County Commissioners of Bernalillo County , Seth Romero and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barrie v. City and County of Denver, The et al
as 1:2016cv02329
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Barrie
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, The, Denver Police Department, The, Lynette Nederhoed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy et al v. Marcantel et al
as 1:2015cv00742
Defendant:
Gregg Marcantel , Joe W. Booker , Jerry Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Many Kennedy , Niadra Lemons , Allison Eastman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Cox et al
as 1:2015cv00525
Plaintiff:
Tekisha Johnson
Defendant:
Raphael Cox, Joseph Garcia, Robert Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Marcantel et al
as 1:2014cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Jake Holt
Defendant:
Gregg Marcantel, Joseph Garcia, Pete Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummins v. Garcia, et al.
as 1:2014cv00558
Petitioner:
Sheldon Cummins
Respondent:
Joseph Garcia and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Garcia, et al
as 14-2014
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREW GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARCIA and GARY KING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
