Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Owaiian M. Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 15-7852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN PATRICK CURRY
Defendant - Appellee:
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL, JOSEPH HIGGS, JOHN DOES and others
Owaiian M. Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 15-7864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL, White Administration and JOSEPH HIGGS
Owaiian M. Jones v. USMS
as 15-7867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, FBI, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Jones et al v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01538
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones and Rappahannock Regional Jail Black Employees
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Fulton, Joseph Higgs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owaiian Jones v. Joseph Higgs, Jr.
as 15-7776
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH HIGGS, JR. and BOW BUFORD
Owaiian Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 15-7771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL, JOHN DOES, JOSEPH HIGGS and others
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01460
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail and Joseph Higgs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USMS et al
as 1:2015cv01456
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
USMS, FBI, DEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2015cv01433
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Joseph Higgs, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Majority of caucasin staff et al
as 1:2015cv01439
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Majority of caucasin staff, Rappahannock Regional Jail, Daily and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
