Cases 41 - 50 of 1,441
Jacobsen v. Unknown Parties et al
as 2:2018cv01044
Plaintiff:
Craig Leslie Jacobsen, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Unknown Party, Paul Penzone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Correctional Health Services et al
as 2:2018cv00948
Plaintiff:
Landry Tinnel Perkins
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services, Joseph M Arpaio and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2018cv00648
Plaintiff:
Melvin Louis Neal, II
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stafford v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2018cv00535
Plaintiff:
Desmond Jeremy Stafford
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Doug Ducey, Maricopa, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olsen v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv00450
Plaintiff:
Troy Timothy Olsen
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2018cv00359
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony Vincent
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2018cv00156
Plaintiff:
Cesar Gustavo Alvarez
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
D'Antonio R Taylor
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv04758
Plaintiff:
Almalik Azeem Ward
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04764
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Gregory Jones
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
