Cases 81 - 90 of 1,441
Mortimer v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03291
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lee Mortimer
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Alvarez et al
as 2:2017cv03189
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Antwon Wilson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Alvarez, Maricopa County Hospital, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coronado v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03206
Plaintiff:
Cornelio Verdugo Coronado
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv03166
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Joseph M Arpaio, S Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03155
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Mendoza
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foran v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03152
Plaintiff:
Sean Timothy Foran
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv03153
Plaintiff:
Talon X Peter
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rojel v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03161
Plaintiff:
Alejandro R Rojel
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv03131
Plaintiff:
Clark Andre Boyd
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruelas v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv03159
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Ruelas
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
