Cases 41 - 50 of 62
J & J Sports Producions, Inc. v. Coyne et al
as 3:2010cv04206
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Producions, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Martin Coyne, Rafael Hernandez and 2 X Play LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony Martini, et al v. William Martin, Jr., et al
as 09-57033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY MARTINI and ANNETTE MARTINI
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM JOSEPH MARTIN, Jr., an individual, MEGAN ALICE BERRY OSHIRO, an individual, EDWARD LEPKOWITZ, an individual and others
Anthony Martini et al v. William Joseph Martin Jr et al
as 8:2009cv00906
Defendant:
Susan Valerie Gelmis, William Joseph Martin Jr, Garry D Malphrus and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martini and Annette Martini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
USA v. Joseph Wubbold
as 09-30034
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH MARTIN WUBBOLD
Andrews v. Doe et al
as 2:2008cv02339
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin Andrews
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Mesa Police Department and Other Arresting Officers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Andrews v. Zachary et al
as 2:2008cv02209
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin Andrews
Defendant:
T Zachary, John Doe and Mesa Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Andrews v. Doe et al
as 2:2008cv02052
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin Andrews
Defendant:
John Doe and Mesa Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin et al v. Client Services, Inc.
as 2:2008cv01917
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin and Dorean Martin
Defendant:
Client Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
