Cases 31 - 40 of 263
Carter v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv07268
Plaintiff:
Vingal Carter
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Maxisolane Mingo, John Doe Officers at AMKC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05042
Defendant:
City of New York, Mayor Bill De Blasio, Deputy Wardens John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Atreyu Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pizarro v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv06506
Plaintiff:
Jose Pizarro, Edwin Hernandez, Antonio Chavarria and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, John/Jane Doe, Monica Windley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pizarro v. Ponte
as 17-2508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose Pizarro
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph Ponte, John/Jane Doe, Warden, A.M.K.C., Intake John/Jane Doe, Deputy, A.M.K.C. and others
Pemberton v. Cross et al
as 1:2017cv05994
Petitioner:
George Pemberton
Respondent:
Cross, Andrew Cuomo, Andrea W. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pizarro v. Bratton
as 17-2378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose Pizarro
Defendant - Appellee:
William Jospeh Bratton, Devin Baker, Shield #28634, Joseph Moloney, Shield # 10143 and others
Pizarro v. N.Y.C. Health & Hospital et al
as 1:2017cv05770
Plaintiff:
Jose Pizarro
Defendant:
N.Y.C. Health & Hospital, Joseph Ponte, Monica Windley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pizarro v. U.S. Post Office et al
as 1:2017cv05729
Plaintiff:
Jose Pizarro
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office, N.Y.C.D.O.C., Joseph Ponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoz v. Doe et al
as 1:2017cv05447
Plaintiff:
Martin Sandoz
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, Joseph Ponte, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton/Obed-Edom v. City of New York
as 17-2128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Benjamin Braxton, AKA Obed-Edom
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, County of Queens, Mayor of the City of New York and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
