Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shine-Johnson et al v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2020cv05919
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Joseph Murphy, UMC Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
James Goodson, Richardo Taborn, Bobby Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 2:2020cv03301
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 5:2020cv00981
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Governor Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alberto Martinez, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 15-2752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALBERTO MARTINEZ, MELITON MARTINEZ, SOFIA MARTINEZ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, DOUGLAS ANDERSON, Star #6325, ALLYSON BOGDALEK, Star #18598 and others
Respondent - Appellant:
MARY E. MCCLELLAN
Alberto Martinez, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 15-2752
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALBERTO MARTINEZ, MELITON MARTINEZ, SOFIA MARTINEZ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, DOUGLAS ANDERSON, Star #6325, ALLYSON BOGDALEK, Star #18598 and others
Respondent:
MARY E. MCCLELLAN
Shine v. University Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv03424
Plaintiff:
Joseph Shine
Defendant:
University Of Chicago and University of Chicago Employee Retirement Income Plan for Employees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Shine v. The University of Chicago
as 1:2012cv08182
Plaintiff:
Joseph Shine
Defendant:
The University of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Martinez et al
as 1:2009cv05938
Plaintiff:
Alberto Martinez, Meliton Martinez, Sophia Martinez and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Douglas Anderson, Robert Kelenyi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
