Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Higgins v. Smith
as 6:2021cv03110
Respondent:
Michael Smith
Petitioner:
Joseph W Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv03098
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Higgins v. Wimes et al
as 6:2021cv03068
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Higgins
Defendant:
Unknown Federal Springfield Judge, Zwart, M. Douglas Harpool and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Higgins v. Ketchmark et al
as 6:2020cv03415
Interested Party:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Higgins
Defendant:
Unknown Federal Springfield Judge, Zwart, M. Douglas Harpool and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Higgins v. Harpool et al
as 6:2020cv03374
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Higgins
Defendant:
M. Douglas Harpool, Unknown and Zwart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins v. Smith
as 6:2020cv03155
Respondent:
Michael D. Smith
Petitioner:
Joseph W Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Higgins v. Burns et al
as 8:2017cv00107
Respondent:
Burns, Douglas County District Court and Lancaster Lincoln Regional Center
Petitioner:
Joseph W. Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Higgins v. Douglas County District Court et al
as 8:2017cv00104
Respondent:
Douglas County District Court and Lincoln Regional Center
Petitioner:
Joseph W. Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Higgins v. Kopf et al
as 8:2016cv00535
Respondent:
Judge Burn, District Court of Douglas County, Mary Dovorak and others
Petitioner:
Joseph W. Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Higgins v. Chief Judge of the Nebraska Supreme Court et al
as 8:2016cv00434
Defendant:
Brad Ashford, Chief Judge of the Nebraska Supreme Court, Head Clerk of the Nebraska Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
