Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Hood v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hood
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Josh Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stillwell v. Austin Pieratt & Pieartt Law PLLC et al
as 5:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Lamario D Stillwell
Defendant:
Austin Pieratt & Pieartt Law PLLC, Josh Holloway, Geico Secure INS CO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Hoskins et al
as 4:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jeremiah Carter
Defendant:
Chuck Hoskins, Jr, Bryan Warner, Sam Hider Health Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Childers v. Valley Brook Town of et al
as 5:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
Josh Childers
Defendant:
Valley Brook Town of and Jeremy Mashore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Treat et al
as 6:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Geg Treat, Greg McCortney, James Leewright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maples v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2021cv00233
Defendant:
Sedona Warren, Nathan Ronan, Austin Mahsetky and others
Plaintiff:
Joanna Maples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. City of Lone Grove, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Josh Berryhill, Cody Conway, City of Lone Grove, Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Johnson, K. M. P., Wesley Todd Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00138
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
